When it comes to certain credit agreements (loans), minnesota has a certain status that it requires in writing. This is essentially a credit fraud rule. “Agreements covered by section 513.33 legally fail if the agreement is not concluded in writing.” Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg. Inc., 690 N.W.2d 757, 761-62 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005) A: Under Minnesota law, a one-year oral lease may be enforceable unless the building has 12 units or more. In this case, each lease must be in writing. If there are less than 12 units, an oral lease may be mandatory, unless it is more than one year old.
You have not specified the size of your building, but if there are 12 or more units, your oral agreement is not binding and your landlord cannot impose a one-year lease because it is not in writing. Some cities have regulations that require written lease agreements for leased property with fewer than 12 units, but Minneapolis doesn`t. If two or more parties reach an agreement without written documentation, they draw up an oral agreement (formally called an oral contract). However, the authority of these oral agreements may constitute a certain grey area for those who are not familiar with contract law. It looks like you want to negotiate a reduction in the rental period. You should let your landlord know that an oral agreement is not binding if the building has 12 or more units and you would prefer to sign a six-month or one-month lease based on your commitment. If there are fewer than 12 units in your building and you have orally agreed to a one-year lease, the oral agreement may be binding depending on the agreed end date. If so, you should still negotiate a six-month or one-month lease with your landlord. If your landlord agrees, make sure you receive a written agreement signed by both parties.
In the case of oral contracts, these generally have a shorter limitation period than written contracts. This is due to the need to provide fresher evidence and testimony. Contractual disputes usually result from one party blaming the other for not working as promised. In Minnesota, a contract is defined as a promise or series of promises for the violation of which the law remedies or whose performance is recognized in some way by law as a duty. Restatement, second of the treaties § 1. People are often surprised to learn that oral chords are as valid as written chords (with the exception of certain types of chords that need to be written, which is discussed below). Oral contracts are very common. “Handshake agreements” work when the parties are friends, family members and if the agreement is simple. These differences can be settled between friendly parties without the need for litigation or infringement.
This problem sometimes occurs when the parties are busy at the courthouse. The judge may require the parties to declare their settlement “in the minutes”, which means that they recite the terms of the agreement in court (while the court journalist records the hearing). Judges usually implement these agreements. See z.B. Beach v. Anderson, 417 N.W.2d 709, 713-14 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988) (this settlement provision, recalled and transcribed by a judicial journalist, met the requirement to write the Fraud Act), refused to verify (Minn. 23 March 1988). A complication that the court faces in the context of oral agreements is that it must be able to extract the key terms of the implementing agreement, which can be difficult if both parties fail to reach an agreement on those terms. The two sides disagree that there was an agreement.
. . .